Mikhail K. Yurasov Changing Objectives of Batu’s Campaign in Hungary and the Reasons for the Mongol Withdrawal in 1242

Abstract
Researchers have traditionally considered Batu’s trek to Central and Southeastern Europe to be purely ruinous. Opinions were also expressed about its reconnaissance nature and the attempt by the Mongols to create a political center in Hungary, the Jochi ulus, a springboard for further movement to the west. Historians saw the reasons for the departure of Batu’s troops from Hungary in the news of the death of the great khan Ögedei, the decline in the military potential of the Mongol army, as well as unfavorable natural conditions. If we consider the Batu campaign of 1241–1242 from the point of view of its goals, it began as a reconnaissance campaign (the actions of the Shiban outposts), after which it became ruinous, taking into account the subsequent incorporation of Hungary into the Mongol Empire. Since this goal proved unattainable, in the winter of 1241/1242 the invasion became purely ruinous in order to export as much production as possible from the country. The final goal of Batu and his entourage was to capture King Béla IV in order to force him to pay tribute to the Mongol khans, but even this proved unattainable. Ögedei’s death served only as a pretext for the Mongols to return to the steppes of Eastern Europe, masking the gradual depletion of the military potential of the Mongol army.

Keywords:

Batu’s Campaign in Hungary; the Formation of the Mongol Empire; the Reign of Bela IV in Hungary

For citation:
Yurasov M.K. Changing Objectives of Batu’s Campaign in Hungary and the Reasons for the Mongol Withdrawal in 1242 // Historical Reporter. 2026. Vol. 56. P. 126–153. DOI: 10.35549/HR.2025.2026.56.004

Mikhail K. Yurasov
D.Sc. (History), Leading Researcher at the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Russian Federation.
e-mail: mihail_yurasov@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-0978-365X

References

1. Annales Frisacenses. / Ed. L. Weiland In: Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores. T. XXIV. Hannoverae. 1879. pp. 65–67.
2. Doberdoi Breit József. A tatárjárás (1236–1242). Bp., 1930 (Magyar nemzet hadtörténelme. V.).
3. Frater Julianus. Epistula de vita Thartarorum // Scriptores rerum Hungaricarum tempore ducum regumque stirpis Arpadianae gestarum / Edendo operi praefuit E. Szentpétery (далее: SRH). Vol. II [repr.]. Budapest, 1999. P.716–720.
4. Herczegh Géza. Magyarország külpolitikája, 896–1919. Bp., 1987.
5. Ioann de Plano Karpini. Istoriya mongolov[History of Mongols]. Text, transl., comm. / A.A. Gorsky, V.V. Trepavlov.М., 2022.
6. Istoriya Vengrii [History of Hungary]. T. I. M., 1971.
7. Jelentés Julianus első útjáról / Ford. Györffy Gy. // A tatárjárás emlékezete. Budapest, 1987. 117–125. l.
8. Juraszov Mihail Konsztantinovics. Batu magyarországi hadjáratának jellegéről és a tátárok elvonulásának okairól // Világtörténet. Budapest, 1989, № 4. 92–103.1.
9. Lederer E. Tatarskoe nashestvie na Vengriyu v svyazi s mezhdunarodnymi otnosheniyami epokhi [The Tatar invasion in Hungary in connection with the international relations of the epoch]. In:Acta Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungariae. T. II. 1953. No. 1–2. pp. 1–45.
10. Magyarország története. I. Előzmények és magyar történet 1242-ig / Főszerk. Székely Gy.2. kiad. Budapest, 1987.
11. Magyarország történeti kronológiája. I. köt. 3. kiad. / Föszerk Benda K. Budapest, 1986.
12. Magistr Rogeriy. Gorestnaya pesn’ o rasorenii vengerskogo korolevstva tatarami [A sorrowful song about the ruin of the Hungarian kingdom by the Tatars]. Transl. from Latin, intr. and comm. by A.S. Dosayev. SPb., 2012.
13. Pashuto V.T. Geroicheskaya bor’ba russkogo naroda za nezavisimost’. XIII vek [The heroic struggle of the Russian people for independence. XIII century]. М., 1956.
14. Pashuto V.T. Mongolskiy pokhod vglub’ Evropy [The Mongol march deep into Europe] In: Tataro-mongoly v Azii i Evrope [Tatar-Mongols in Asia and Europe].М., 1977. pp. 210–227.
15. Pavlushkova M.A. Annotatsiya na stat’yu E.Lederer “Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya v period tatarskogo nashestviya” [Abstract to the article by E. Lederer "International relations during the Tartar invasion"]. In: Sredniye veka [The Middle Ages].Т. 5. 1954. pp. 407–409.
16. Pinter János Zsolt. Tatárok és magyarok In: Hadtörténelmi Közlemények. 118 (2005). 3. sz. 660–696. l.
17. Relatio fratri Ricardi / Ed. I. Deér. In: SRH. Vol. II. Budapestini, 1938. Р. 529–542.
18. Rogerii Carmen miserabile / Ed. L. Juhász. In: SRH. Vol. II. P.543–588.
19. Schütz Ödön. A mongol hódítás néhány problémájához.In: Századok. 1959. No. 2–4. 209–232. l.
20. Sinor D. The Mongols in the West. In: Journal of Asian History. 33/1. 1999. pp. 1–44.
21. Strakosch-Grassmann Gustav. Der Einfall der Mongolen in Mitteleuropa in der Jahren 1241–1242. Innsbruck, 1893.
22. Szabó János B. A tatárjárás: A mongol hódítás és Magyarország. Budapest, 2007.
23. A tatárjárás emlékezete / Szerk. Katona Tamás, bev. Györffy György. Bp., 1987.
24. Vseobshchaya istoriya s IV stoletiya do nashegoveremeni [General history from the fourth century to the present] / E. Lavisse, A. Rambaud.Transl. from French. Т. II. M., 1897.
25. Zichy Ladomér. A tatárjárás Magyarországon. Pécs, 1934.
26. https://24.hu/tudomány/2021/11/07/tatarjaras-batu-kanvalasztas-kozepkor-tortenelem (in Hungarian).24.hu.2021. november 7
27. https:/index.hu/tudomany/tortenelem/2016/05/26/a_tatarok_nem_birtak_a_inagyar_klimat/ (2016.05.26).